'What has Islands Trust done for me lately?' was a question that sparked a discussion at the Thetis Island Residents and Ratepayers Association meeting on March 27.
It's a great question that hopefully will to lead to further community discussions. It will encourage us to reflect on the way our community is managed and hopefully reach a deeper understanding of the blessings and challenges of our unique local government.
As the Chair of the Gulf Islands Alliance (GIA), a non-profit volunteer group of islanders formed in 2005 and dedicated to supporting the Islands Trust mandate, I've had the privilege of working with others from the 13 main islands in the Trust Area most often monitoring how closely the Trust complies with the spirit and letter of the visionary Trust Act.
The idea for the Trust got started in the 1960s when developers took advantage of weak local bylaws to inappropriately zone small-lot subdivisions on Pender and Salt Spring Islands. The province, vowing not let BC's precious jewel, the Gulf Islands, slip through its fingers, at first discouraged the development onslaught and then by 1974 adopted the Trust Act, which has gained international recognition as an inspirational model for preserving special places. GIA commissioned a legal opinion that confirmed the Trust Act has considerable weight -- a judge once said the Act "is no mere piety" -- in protecting our natural environment.
So, it's no accident that we live in a beautiful and tranquil place. The Trust has been fighting for 40 years to keep it that way. Living between burgeoning metropolises to the east and southwest, the Trust has saved us from drowning in an urban wave.
Unlike traditional local governments, the Trust doesn't provide services beyond managing land use. It appears that only about 10 or 11 percent of property tax dollars goes to the Trust. We shouldn't complain about not getting things they can't legally provide.
Several years ago voters on Gabriola and Salt Spring soundly rejected bids to incorporate their islands. They were aware that after Bowen Island had become a municipality taxes there suddenly increased because they had to assume policing and road construction costs. We should know the price before we buy an alternative to the Trust.
To make it clear, GIA embraces only the environmental vision of the Trust Act, not the Trust as people or an organization. Sure, we applauded when the Trust boldly stood up to the province and BC Ferries for their ludicrous fare and service changes that are killing coastal communities and to the federal government over the specter of increased oil tanker traffic in Georgia Strait. But we have been equally critical of the Trust's often lax bylaw enforcement, its ambiguous Policy Statement (it interprets the Trust Act), and a staff that sometimes shows more reverence for planning than appreciating the laid-back rural culture that must be sustained to truly preserve and protect this beautiful place where we live.
Dave Steen